Skip to content
Hookgap

What 64 local law, dental and accounting firms' DNS tells us

· 4 min read

How common are email security gaps among the kind of businesses MSPs serve? We took a small, honest sample: professional firms in one US city, checked with the same public DNS lookups every mail server performs.

Results

FindingFirmsShare
No DMARC record41 of 6464%
DMARC p=none (monitoring only)15 of 6423%
DMARC p=quarantine6 of 649%
DMARC p=reject2 of 643%
No SPF record19 of 6430%

Put simply: 56 of 64 firms (87.5%) did not enforce DMARC, so email that pretends to come from them is not blocked by DMARC. Only 8 firms had a policy of quarantine or reject.

Method

  • Sample: businesses tagged as lawyers, dentists or accountants with a website inside the city limits of Columbus, Ohio, in OpenStreetMap. That gave 65 entries and 64 unique domains (42 law, 20 dental and 3 accounting entries).
  • Checks: a TXT lookup for each domain (SPF) and for _dmarc. plus the domain (DMARC), through Cloudflare's public DNS-over-HTTPS resolver, on 18 October 2026.
  • Passive only: no systems were contacted beyond public DNS. No individual firms are named here.

Limitations

  • It is a small sample from one city and three verticals, and OpenStreetMap's business coverage is incomplete. Treat the numbers as indicative, not as a national statistic.
  • Some firms' websites use a different domain from their email, so a few "no DMARC" results may belong to website-only domains.
  • DNS changes over time. These numbers describe one day.

What it means for MSPs

If two thirds of a vertical have no DMARC at all, you are not hunting for rare prospects. You can pick a vertical you already know, check 30 local firms, and expect most of them to have a concrete, explainable gap. The DMARC prospecting playbook shows how to turn that into a first meeting.

Want to see your own local market? A bulk check gives you the same picture for any list of domains in a few minutes.